Calvert-Henderson Quality of Life Indicators
Click on the links to navigate the site
Education Indicator Employment Indicator Energy Indicator Environment Indicator Health Indicator Human Rights Indicator
About Us Income Indicator Infrastructure Indicator National Security Indicator Public Safety Indicator Re-Creation Indicator Shelter Indicator
Current Issues
Overview
Background
Archives
Calvert-Henderson Quality of Life Indicators
Advisory Board
Endorsements
Order the Book
Experts
Search
Contact Us
Home


Hazel Henderson on the set of Globo TV's Top financial show, Brasil

Update: July, 2010

Nonfarm payrolls decreased by 125,000 in May, mostly due to the end of  temporary census jobs. The unemployment rate fell to 9.5%.  The Household Survey still was showing unemployment at 14.6 million, with 6.8 million, 46% having been jobless for 27 weeks or more.  Since December, non-farm payroll employment has expanded by 882,000, with 593,000 jobs added in the private sector.  This is welcome news for recovery, in spite of the market jitters due to Europe's problems.

The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) advance estimate of GDP growth in the second quarter of 2010 is 2.4%, a deceleration due to less inventory spending, exports, and state and local government spending, but partly offset by an increase in private fixed investment.. The annual revisions to the past three years resulted in lower estimates (0.2 to 0.04) for all three years.  The latest estimate for the first quarter of 2010 is now up to 3.7%, while the GDP growth in Q4 of 2009 was, as we expected, revised down to 5.0%.  We expected it to be a much lower figure.  BEA admits that most of the increase was due to additional building of inventories and deceleration of imports.  My interview on Jan. 31, 2010, with John Williams, pre-eminent expert on deconstructing US official statistics at www.shadowstats.com, confirmed my distrust of this revised Q4 2009 GDP-growth of 5.6%.  Williams agrees with us that "GDP is the worst quality information from the US government."  The inventory buildup accounted for over 3.6% of that first 5.9% GDP-growth estimate; 1.5% as an over-statement of the Personal Consumption Expenditure which GDP states as up by 2% and another .5% as related to the actual widening of the overall trade deficit – even though BEA emphasized that the deceleration of imports is accounted for as part of its rise of 5.9% in GDP.  Discouraged workers still bring the total unemployment rate to approximately 16.8%.  Many economic reports indicate that the US recovery was illusory (Seeking Alpha, February 25, 2010).

I have long explored the entire range of distortions that make GDP a perverse measure of US progress, and TIME's article agrees, pointing to our Calvert-Henderson Quality of Life Indicators and others including the United Nations Human Development Index (HDI).   

At last, better measures of human progress are gaining mainstream media attention: the excellent Canadian Index of Wellbeing (CIW) at www.ciw.ca and the new report by British researchers Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett linking equality with quality of life within and across countries.  They find that countries with the most equal income distribution (by GINI) have the largest socially and politically prosperous middle class while unequal countries do worse on most quality of life indicators (www.equalitytrust.org.uk).  The USA scores poorly and confirms John Williams' and our view that a massive overhaul of GDP, unemployment, inflation, money supply and other US statistics is now urgent if we are to address the need for more jobs.

Why has the weak US recovery still produced so few jobs?  The BLS "Establishment Survey" differs from the broader "Household Survey" which records the civilian labor force in small companies often failing or unable to obtain financing, which the Establishment Survey cannot detect.  For 20 years, I have pointed to reasons the USA has experienced "jobless growth"  - rooted in the abstractions of macroeconomics theories and methods.  The faith in "free trade" has prevented government agencies from making use of futurists' broader forecasting and planning methods used by most global corporations.  Their economic advisors' market fundamentalism warned against "industrial policy" except for that covertly practiced by the Department of Defense and activities in the name of "national security."  Thus, the "hollowing out" of US manufacturing has continued for two decades at the behest of global corporations and their investment bankers.  President Bush I famously held that it did not matter whether the US manufactured computer chips or potato chips, while President Bush II's chair of the Council of Economic Advisors, Gregory Mankiw, maintained that outsourcing was good for American workers who could take their severance pay and 401Ks and become day traders on the stock markets.

Add to these idiocies the stout denials by economists that increasing capital-intensive technological change, automating manufacturing and services would create the structural unemployment we see today.  Conventional measures of output per capita masked this technological unemployment as beneficial "increases in productivity" for decades, as we have pointed out.  Unfortunately, Obama administration economic advisors are mostly steeped in conventional theories and models which continue to serve Wall Street and corporate interests at the expense of workers and individuals ( see the excellent reports at www.prospect.org).

Adding to June's 9.5% unemployment rate, the "discouraged" and "part-timers" still makes the total almost 17%.  Although the recession is deemed officially ended, the recovery will be fragile until job creation picks up. This may not get big banks to step up lending to domestic companies since they make more money with proprietary trading, hoarding their bailout funds or sending them offshore. The good news of the 2.7% GDP uptick in Q1 must be seen in the context of 2009's negative growth. These numbers underline what most Americans have experienced for the past years, along with the loss of over 8.4 million jobs since December 2007.  States facing their new fiscal year are wrestling with budget shortfalls with California's at $24 billion, while Illinois and Arizona have much smaller deficits.  North Dakota still stars with continuing budget surpluses, as we discuss later.

 President Obama's $787 billion Economic Recovery and Reinvestment plan is now underway and its effect showed in the GDP improvement.  Deeply entrenched ideologies and special-interest politics are battling over the 2010 budget of $3.6 trillion. Cutting the Pentagon's weapons procurement and subsidies for big farmers would boost investments in education, health care, efficiency and renewable energy.  At least the President's 30,000 troop surge will be costed transparently in the budget.  All this was emphasized by the oversight report on TARP, July 21st that US taxpayers are liable for up to $23.7 trillions of bailouts (www.sigtarp.gov).  All this shows that the great transition from the fossil-fueled, unsustainable Industrial Era to the green economy of the Solar Age (see my The Politics of the Solar Age, 1981) is now well underway. 

Private investments in SolarAge companies since 2007 total $1.24 trillion (see our Green Transition Scoreboard at www.EthicalMarkets.com).  The Copenhagen conference only confirmed the need to ramp up private and public investments in green economic development, particularly in developing countries.  The $350 billion given to banks by former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and the new incumbent Timothy Geithner has apparently been wasted.  The uproar over AIG bonuses made executive pay an international issue for the G-20 in Pittsburgh, Sept 24-25th, along with tighter regulation of all financial markets.  The United Nations General Assembly Meeting in New York, June 24-26th, debated the global financial crisis and adopted many of the recommendations of its Commission of Experts, chaired by Joseph Stiglitz.  In my editorial, “Game Over!”, (www.ethicalmarkets.com), I describe the new power of this new group of 192 nations which critiqued the G-20, the G-7 and the G-8, calling for a new global reserve currency, much deeper reforms than proposed by the Obama Administration, as well as the need for a tax on all global financial transactions favored in Europe, which is on the agenda of the G-20 summit in TOronto, June 26-27, 2010 (www.un.org/ga).  

US voters are still furious, demanding to know why their schools and other vital services are being cut and why small banks, credit unions and homeowners were not included in the bailout.  This anger over the unfairness of the bailouts of those "too big to fail" corporations spilled over onto the healthcare debate – amplified by coverage of unruly town hall meetings.  Meanwhile, local initiatives to restore homegrown economies are flourishing (see my "Democratizing Finance" at www.ethicalmarkets.com).  The campaign "Move Your Money" (from big to small banks and to credit unions) is catching on, while many are studying the state Bank of North Dakota which has kept the state's budget in surplus and grown local jobs (www.ethicalmarkets.com The Public Option in Banking).

Trickle down economics of bailing out Wall Street is colliding with the bottom-up demands of middle class voters for fairness, accountability and transparency.  Hearings of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission and the wrangling over Senator Dodd's bill to reform financial markets has led to the demands to audit the Fed.  It's about time for this debate and the deeper debate about whether money is more important than the other forms of wealth that GDP counts and why Wall Street doesn't count: human "capital," knowledge, ecological assets and productivity.  President Obama campaigned for recognition of these uncounted forms of wealth and of the higher values of Americans: trust in each other and our institutions and fairness in rewarding hard work in an economy designed to include opportunities for a better future for all.  Many new investors see these opportunities, as I describe in "The New Financiers."

Now for the good news.  The confluence of the financial meltdown and increasing threats to climate stability are leading to much creativity by these new financiers in devising new ways of investing in the needed global transition to a low carbon "re-industrialization."  The weakness of the Waxman-Markey energy bill passed in the US Congress by 7 votes focused the critiques of its reliance on Wall Street-centric cap and trade markets which have so far failed to reduce carbon emissions. The new financiers' spate of proposals for a "Marshall Plan" type plan to finance a doubling of production of carbon-free, efficiency and renewable energy and smart infrastructure every year for the next 10 years are welcome indeed (see International Climate Bonds Proposals – Draft from the Network for Sustainable Financial Markets at www.ethicalmarkets.com, courtesy of Sean Kidney and Climate Risk Pty of Australia).  Their report, Climate Solutions II: Low Carbon Re-Industrialization was also supported by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and is downloadable from www.EthicalMarkets.com.

This rapid deployment of solar, wind, geothermal, ocean power sources as well as retro fitting for maximum energy efficiency over 10 years is projected to cost $10 trillion.  This can be covered by issuance of several classes of new assets: long-bonds, zero coupon bonds, with hedging against the main risk: governments back-sliding on their greenhouse gas emissions targets under the Kyoto Protocol.  While this seems like a  large sum, it is less than 10% of the $120 trillion in pension funds and other institutional portfolios.  Since pension funds and other government bonds focus on long maturities, they are ideally suited to finance climate prosperity bonds out of the savings they will produce: from energy efficiency and in reducing the cost of renewable energy (with free fuel sources from the Earth) over the costs of fossil fuels (projected to keep slowly rising).  More good news is the collapse of gas prices due to the availability of gas deposits in shale in the USA and other countries.  This allows coal-fired power plants to replace coal with cheaper natural gas for base loads as well as peak power.  Thus, many coal-fired plants may be retired and few will now be built.

Business leaders met in Copenhagen in May 2009 to address climate risks in their companies' fossil-fueled processes and agreed that the opportunities in shifting to a green, solar, wind, geothermal, ocean and energy-efficient global economy were enormous.  The 700 business leaders participating in the meeting declared that immediate action would be cheaper than any further delays.  While 193 governments failed to agree at the UN Conference in Climate in Copenhagen in December 2009, investments in low-carbon technology sectors continue to grow.

The key will be to keep pressure on governments to stop back-sliding and pandering to the fossil-fueled industry sectors with toothless cap and trading which will only make Wall Street players richer.  Downsizing bloated financial sectors will be imperative.  Those on Wall Street and in London grew to 25% of U.S. and U.K. GDP.  An efficient financial sector should be less than 10% of a country's GDP.  Yet Washington has still to follow through with vital reforms, while Britain's head of their Financial Services Authority agrees that financial sectors must be downsized and recommended the tax on financial transactions.  Debate is growing that such a tax is the best way to assess Wall Street for its cleanup costs – rather than taxpayers.

So today's GDP figures still force us to re-examine our rearview-mirror focus on the costly past and reformulate statistics themselves which only measure money transactions. They overlook the savings in shifting to the new green economy and the vast riches in our society from energy-efficiency while ignoring the almost 50% of all productive work that is unpaid and therefore omitted from GDP.  From caring for our homes, children, the elderly and sick and volunteering in our communities to exchanging and bartering goods and services, this vast unpaid "love economy" is thriving and increasingly electronically traded on e-Bay, Craigslist, Freecycle, time-banking and hundreds of other websites, flea markets and on radio programs and via cell phones.  My monograph with physicist Fritjof Capra, "Qualitative Growth," published by Britain's Society of Chartered Accountants and Tomorrow's Company, was launched in the House of Lords in Britain's Parliament in November, 2009, co-sponsored by WWF, the World Wildlife Fund. 

President Obama's team includes Google CEO Eric Schmidt who understands the transition to the green economy and sees all the new possibilities in the Energy Transition, such as that proposed by the Dutch Planck Foundation and Ethical Markets.  The explosion of internet and community trading such as Making Change Without Money, the title of a new series of papers by Gwendolyn Hallsmith and Edgar Cahn, both pioneer community organizers.  I have been pointing to all these alternatives to government-printed money as well as all the local currencies helping to clear local markets: e.g., the Schumacher Society's Berkshares in Massachusetts and time-based currencies based on Paul Glover's Ithaca Hours (www.smallisbeautiful.com). 

The shocking truth that a badly designed, irresponsible, poorly regulated financial system can disrupt the lives of millions is now opening our eyes to practical alternatives to re-knit our communities – by-passing Wall Street and bankers' money games.  Reform of the Federal Reserve System is now before Congress which would curb the power of banks to create our money and restore this to our government (see www.monetary.org). A chorus of Freedom of Information demands forced the Fed to finally describe where all the bailout money for the big banks and AIG was disbursed.  Billions went to pay off Goldman Sachs' bets at 100% and other credit default swaps held by other Wall Street firms as well as foreign banks.  These kinds of credit derivatives should be banned.  $683 trillion of these (Bank for International Settlements December 2008) overhang a world economy whose GDP is only $62 trillion! (IMF October 2008).  The only issue is who should take the hit in writing them off.  So far, the political clout of the financial sectors has forced the bill on to taxpayers.  The SEC is slow in promulgating reforms on short-selling, as is the CFTC in bringing credit derivatives under regulation on new clearing houses.  Germany announced a ban on short-selling in May.  In the USA, financial reform has been gutted by lobbyists for Wall Street, so reform to prevent another meltdown is up to the G-20.

At last, all the efforts over the past 30 years to correct our money-based GDP, including indicators of education, health and environment and subtract costs of pollution and resource-depletion are being publicly debated.  When we add in that 50% of unpaid work and accounts for our human, social and ecological assets, we will take heart in our real wealth and community riches.  The European Parliament's lead in its Beyond GDP debate in 2007 set the stage, and the commission headed by economist Joseph Stiglitz and Amartya Sen  reported in April on how to make these corrections to GDP so that our national scorecards of progress can steer us toward restoring health to the real economies of Main Street.  (See my critique of its weak recommendations at www.EthicalMarkets.com.)

The European Commission's conference Beyond GDP in the Parliament November 19-20, 2007, was attended by 700 experts and parliamentarians.  I am honored to serve as a member of the Advisory Board.  EU President Barosso and the President of the Parliament both endorsed the goal to integrate social environmental statistics.  A survey in ten countries by GlobeScan and Ethical Markets Media found large majorities in all favoring this broadening of GDP (www.EthicalMarkets.com and www.beyond.gdp.eu).  A re-run of this survey is planned for 2010.  A new effort has been launched, The State of the USA, funded by the Hewlett Foundation, with federal funding in 2010.  The U.S. Senate held hearings in the Commerce Committee on "Re-thinking GDP as a Measure of National Strength" on March 12, 2008 -- with input from me on our Indicators, submitted for the record, but ignored by media..  The "BEYOND GDP" issue is now promoted in many countries by the SIMPOL network which fosters simultaneous policy adoption by politicians of such proposals for global sustainability (www.simpol.org.uk). Even The Economist editorialized in "Grossly Distorted Picture" (March 13, 2008) that GDP growth was not the best measure of national progress (see my editorials at www.HazelHenderson.com). China's President Hu Jintao called for continued effort on it "Green GDP" in spite of resistance by local officials to push traditional GDP-growth (China Daily, July 17, 2007).

China devised its own changes to GDP accounting to subtract pollution and resource depletion (The Economist, "Greening of China," Oct 22, 2005, p. 43). This "Green GDP" deducted 3% of environmental costs of the current GNP-growth economic model according to a Task Force Interim Report (2007). However, local officials still judged by GDP-growth managed to suspend the Green GDP.  As China's pollution is now visible on TV worldwide, after the Olympic Games, we believe the Green GDP will be reinstated. The British government report by Sir Nicholas Stern, the former chief economist of the World Bank, states that stabilizing CO2 emissions at 550 parts per million could cost one percent of global GDP growth and would prevent a likely global depression and economic losses of from 5-20% of global GDP (Financial Times, Oct 20, 2006).   China is moving rapidly to create its own green economy and is already the world's largest producer of solar panels, a leader in wind power and has the first plug-in hybrid car on sale now which will reach the US market in 2010 costing $22,000. 

Inflation is no longer the immediate worry, as personal consumption is falling. Long-term, inflation is likely to rise following the trillions of various government bailouts, Fed easing, loans, etc.  The G-20 leaders of Brazil, Russia, India and China are offering proposals for a new global reserve currency: either a "basket" of major currencies or IM F Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) to be expanded.  China, with over $1 trillion of US bonds, is nervous about inflation of US dollars.  The June 26-27 G-20 Summit in Toronto will discuss these proposals and the overdue need to end subsidies on fossil fuels.

Many government rule changes are being enacted with no cost to taxpayers, including the FASB's new guidance rules allowing "significant judgment" on "fair value" modification of the "mark to market" rules, while providing greater transparency.  Bringing back the uptick rule and regulating short-selling are still under review as well as naked shorting and other such criminal activities.  The G-20 could agree to less a than 1% tax on the global currency trading of up to $4 trillion daily (mostly speculation) by installing computer systems like FXTRS (see paper at www.hazelhenderson.com).  Cleaning up Wall Street is necessary to restore confidence and the financial sector needs downsizing from its bloated 20% of US GDP to an efficient financial sector of less than 10% of GDP.  Unrealistic pay and bonuses will also need cutting.

Congress can, for a start:

  • Focus the balance of the TARP's $350 billion on local lending through credit unions.  Mortgages now "under water" should require lenders to take at least 50% of the "haircuts", similar to the Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC) from the 1930s.
  • Re-instate the very small tax on stock transactions of at least .25% as in the Securities Turnover Excise Tax enacted in 1914 and repealed in 1966.  Many other countries in Europe and Asia levy such a tax, which curbs speculation and would bring in the USA some $150 billion per year.
  • Extend further Production Tax Credits for renewable energy and add $150 billion to develop solar, wind, geothermal and upgrade our electric grid.  Reduce the over $200 billion of annual subsidies to fossil fuels and nuclear power -- so as to create a level playing field.
  • Invest more in restoring and maintaining US infrastructure.
  • Re-instate federal revenue sharing with states.
  • Extend unemployment insurance to laid off employees.

Some of these proposals are now part of the Economic Stabilization and Reinvestment Plan.

Oil prices around $80 are still less than the high of $145 per barrel.  Much of the drop is due to reduced demand due to the now global recession.  Yet oil may stay at $80 a barrel since $70 is the average cost of production. Constant media coverage, million-strong protest groups like those at www.StopOilSpeculation.com, and investigations by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the US Senate scared off pension funds and college endowments that lost heavily on their oil bets!  As I point out in my "Changing the Game of Finance," it's time for asset managers to ditch their obsolete "efficient markets" hypothesis and adopt new ESG (environment, social, governance) asset valuation models, i.e., triple bottom line accounting.  Thus, many speculators began unwinding their long positions and this, plus reduced demand, brought the price down.  We agree with the "peak oil" researchers that supply is not keeping pace with demand.  Yet speculation was another factor, denied by most financial players (see my "A Closer Look at Oil Speculators"), as was the flight from the US dollar, bonds and equities into commodity index funds as a hedge against inflation (see also "New Games in the Global Casino", Inter Press Service, June 2008 and at www.EthicalMarkets.com). The financial crisis mentality in Congress, Wall Street and the financial media has led to unprecedented volatility. Useful checks on government statistics: GDP, CPI, Unemployment and M-3 are available at www.shadowstats.com compiled by economist John Williams who tracks data revisions that overstate the performance of the US economy.

The unemployment rate, now at 9.5%, still excludes those "discouraged" while including increases in part-time jobs held by those needing full-time work, bringing the true rate to 17%. The Fed's easing to 0.25% rates, which are effectively zero, leaves fixed-income investors with few choices.  All these bouncing numbers and uncertainty about Congress continue to spook markets.  The Fed can no longer oblige Wall Street with more interest rate cuts.  Chairman Bernanke, whose re-appointment was supported by President Obama, no doubt realizes his own role in pushing up oil and food prices and hurting the US dollar.  The result is that commodities became a new asset class, which then crashed.  Traders piled into commodities with 16 to 1 leverage due to low margin requirements.  The quickest, best way to curb the pure speculators is to raise margin requirements to force traders to put up their own money.  The CFTC closed the "ENRON loophole" enacted in 2000 which shielded energy trading from oversight, and is addressing the "London loophole" where traders move to the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE).  Subsidies for ethanol and mandates in legislation should also be repealed.  

The Fed's job with so many new tasks is now harder -- trying to steer between recession and inflation. Interest rates are actually negative when corrected for inflation.  The role of the Fed, a private institution owned by its 12 regions' banks, is now coming under scrutiny by Bloomberg, Fox Business News and other media for its secrecy, while over 300 Congress members have co-sponsored Ron Paul's bill to audit the Fed.  State-owned banks like the Bank of North Dakota could expand local lending.  It provides funds to local banks for low-cost credit directly to North Dakota's infrastructure, education and services, as well as businesses (see "Monetize This!" and "Escape from Pottersville" by Ellen Brown at www.ethicalmarkets.com).  The middle class is hurting from high prices, job losses and foreclosures. 

A revealing look at these issues is A Demon of Our Own Design (2007) by former hedge fund manager Richard Bookstaber and Fools Gold by Gillian Tett of the Financial Times showing how financial engineering of ever-more exotic swaps, derivatives, options, etc are themselves adding to market instabilities worldwide. Another market institution, the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) has a backlog in handling the huge volume of derivatives trading.  Much of the volatility on Wall St. is due to the failure of these exotic "quant" models and the need for hedge fund managers to sell assets to cover margin calls from their bankers. Yet other challenges to Wall Street's conventional wisdom are the best-seller, The Black Swan, by veteran options trader and mathematician Nassim Nicholas Taleb, and Lecturing Birds on Flying by Paulo Triana, who critique risk assessment models used by investors and banks.  I made similar critiques of such models as Value At Risk (VAR) used so widely that unanticipated events could lead to system-wide crises in The UN: Policy & Financing Alternatives which I co-edited (Elsevier Scientific, UK, 1995, 1996).

Inflation must keep the Fed on alert longer term, despite new fears that collapsing demand may mean deflation.  The core rate (excluding food and energy) is suspect, prompting a scathing editorial in The Economist calling this use of the core index "highly misleading" since most people eat and drive! (June 23, 2007, p.16)  We have made this same point for many years.  Meanwhile, behind all the headline numbers, average wages for non-supervisory workers remained stagnant, foreclosures continue, house prices stagnate, and many deeper structural problems in the USA go unaddressed.  The $787 stimulus has repaired some USA infrastructure and provided some green jobs. The growing green economy worldwide is overlooked by Wall Street's obsolete asset-allocation models dominated by the fossil fueled sectors (see my The Sustainability Sector at www.seekingalpha.com).  The growing gap between rich and less affluent citizens is worrying Democrats and Republicans - but their concerns offered the familiar remedy: more GNP-based economic growth.  Economist Joseph Stiglitz now estimates the Iraq occupation will total $3 trillion in his The Three Trillion Dollar War (2008).

I hope the Calvert-Henderson Quality of Life Indicators may whet your appetite to delve deeper and feed your interest in some or all of these aspects of quality of life. These Indicators are featured in the financial TV series "Ethical Markets," which showcases the most ethical CEOs and companies, the cleanest and greenest technologies, and all the new indices of socially responsible companies. This series is airing on many PBS stations covering 45 million households in the USA (see www.ethicalmarkets.com).  We will continue tracking this holistic view of our lives, society, and the economy, so that you can remain empowered with these facts, as citizens, consumers, employers and investors. Below are links to more details about current issues relating to:

Hazel Henderson can be reached at www.hazelhenderson.com