|
Health Indicator
We are delighted to announce our new expert advisor,
Dr. Trevor Hancock, prominent
internationally for his work on health indicators focusing on prevention
and broad public health factors. Dr. Hancock, who serves on our
Advisory Board, is a full time advisor to the Ministry of Health
Planning of British Columbia, Canada. Dr. Hancock, among his many
important posts has advised the World Health Organization, many
European governments, and was Regents Lecturer at the University
of California, Berkeley in the School of Public Health. With Dr.
Hancock's help, our Health Indicator will now include Healthy Life
Expectancy, factoring in disability and quality of life as people
age.
Our Health
Indicatorshows that the United States provides more
health care services at higher costs per capita than any other country
in the world - but with no better outcomes than countries spending
much less. After the anthrax attacks of 2001 , the US public health
services were revealed as woefully under-funded and wholly inadequate
to their new tasks in an age of bioterrorism. Some funding increases
have passed the Congress, but are still viewed by health professionals
as a fraction of what is required. The enormous health sector of
our economy is also becoming a top focus of national concern since
it delivers only modest improvements in health status in some areas
and none in others. Of growing concern are the over 40 million Americans
who have no health insurance. Meanwhile, the National Bureau of
Economic Research (NBER) released a working paper, which finds that
better health boosts a country's GNP. Authors David Bloom and JP
Sevilla analyzed data from 104 countries and found that a one-year
improvement in a country's life expectancy contributes a 4% increase
in its economic output (December 3, 2001). This points to the need
to re-categorize health budgets in GNP/GDP national accounts from
"expense" items to investments in human capital. The debate
over a "Patient's Bill of Rights" to hold health maintenance
organizations and insurance companies more accountable for decisions
over patient treatment is becoming urgent. Pharmaceutical companies'
drug prices soar at three times the rate of inflation and the Medicare-related
law passed in 2003, providing drug coverage for seniors, has been
widely-criticized for the "holes" in its benefits and rewards to
pharmaceutical companies. Concerns grow regarding the privacy of
medical records, and drug reactions and medical mistakes proliferate.
Newer worries concern terrorism and the need for public health clinics
nationwide, where uninsured people who may have been exposed to
pathogens can be quickly tested and evaluated so as to limit epidemics.
The Health Indicator offers
a model of our current system that helps to clarify the situation
as a systemic set of issues. Health is being redefined beyond the
medical intervention model. Today, Americans are focusing on prevention,
public health, stress-reduction, and life-style choices. Beyond
terrorism, tobacco and alcohol use and even the availability of
guns are issues entering the public health debate. More Americans
now consult "complementary" and "alternative"
health providers than visit conventional medical doctors and facilities.
This is a paradigm shift that is restructuring the entire medical-industrial
complex and its technocratic, bureaucratic approach, which represents
14 percent of our GDP.
How will we integrate all these very different
approaches to health? How will we provide for those left out of
the current system, especially children? An October 1999 study in
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's Economic Policy Review
cites the effects of urban poverty. Fifteen-year-old black and white
male's life expectancy rates were compared in several cities.
In areas of New York City that were predominantly low-income and
African American, only 37% of the population was expected to live
to age 65. In Detroit, the figure was 50%. White fifteen-year-olds
in poverty areas of Detroit and Cleveland did a little better. In
Detroit, 60% were found likely to live to age 65 with 64% likely
in Cleveland. Average life expectancy for all US whites is 77 years
compared to 62 years for blacks. Our indicator allows us to see
such gaps, which of course relate to similar data in our Income,
Shelter, Public Safety,
Education, and Human
Rights Indicators.
|